Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dpwiener
The fictional book was entertaining, as I imagine the fictional movie is entertaining. MHO - most people that go to watch a fictional tale would like it, good director (Opie) good actor (Tom) and historic locations. Alas with a couple of young ones I need to wait until Netflix has it.
5 posted on 08/16/2006 1:54:04 PM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SF Republican
T"he fictional book was entertaining, as I imagine the fictional movie is entertaining."

You are half right. Although I consider myself a devout Christian I read the book and enjoyed it for what it was - an entertaining piece of fiction with a novel plot. The movie however, sucked. They had way to many drawn out scenes of dialogue attempting to establislh the back story. That works in a book but makes for a really boring movie. The only character that displayed any real acting chops was the guy who played Gandolf in the LOTR movies.

58 posted on 01/16/2007 11:47:50 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson