Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lwoodham
"...what a 100 megaton device can do..."

For the record: We don't have a 100MT bomb; never have.
In fact the largest known nuke was an estimated 60MT the soviets detonated back in the 60s. They claimed to have a 100MT, but we doubted it. Why don't we have such monsters?
Simple. They don't do as much damage as more numerous smaller bombs, they just make a big hole in the ground.

About the only thing they might be useful for would be a high-altitude burst to create an EMP to knock out electronics. Or remove about a quarter of a mountain somewhere (but the fallout would be bad from that; worldwide that is.)
228 posted on 08/13/2006 3:22:32 PM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( ISLAMA DELENDA NECCES EST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
Ivan might have been "only" 50 megatons. In comparison, the biggest the U.S. has detonated (or at admitted to, anyway) was only 15 megatons.

Ivan could have concievedly been a 100 megaton device, if the Soviets had not chosen to use a non-functioning "tamper"(lead, in this case). Had they used U-238 (depleted Uranium) instead, that would have been the 3rd stage of the fission-fusion-fission thermonuclear "hydrogen bomb" 3 stage reaction/detonation.

Here's an old pic, pre-detonation, of course ;)


307 posted on 08/14/2006 1:13:40 PM PDT by BlueDragon (a handgun is best used for fighting one's way to a RIFLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson