To: garbageseeker
And this "deal" is supposed to do what, exactly? Hezbollah essentially runs Lebanon, so instead of Hezzie "irregulars" firing rockets at Israel and conducting cross-border raids into Israel under UN protection, it will be "Lebaneze" regulars firing said rockets and conducting said cross-border raids.
21 posted on
08/11/2006 8:29:39 PM PDT by
steveegg
(Let's make the deeply-saddened Head KOmmie deeply soddened in Nov. - deny the 'RATs the election)
To: garbageseeker
Amended the end of the original post (shouldn't do this while tired :-) -
...so instead of Hezzie "irregulars" firing rockets at Israel and conducting cross-border raids into Israel under passive UN protection, it will be "Lebaneze" regulars firing said rockets and conducting said cross-border raids under active UN protection.
23 posted on
08/11/2006 8:35:32 PM PDT by
steveegg
(Let's make the deeply-saddened Head KOmmie deeply soddened in Nov. - deny the 'RATs the election)
To: steveegg
Hezbollah essentially runs Lebanon, so instead of Hezzie "irregulars" firing rockets at Israel and conducting cross-border raids into Israel under UN protection, it will be "Lebaneze" regulars firing said rockets and conducting said cross-border raids.
That is the problem. The U.S. wanted UN troops under Chapter 6 of the UN charter. I believe under Chapter 6, the UN troops are authorized to fire. But instead, the U.S. had to accept the regular UN troops without any arms. Somebody please correct me if that is wrong. I cannot believe that Israel accepted that deal.
29 posted on
08/11/2006 8:53:42 PM PDT by
garbageseeker
("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson