Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

"I have a fairly good digital camera and whatever I download is what I get."

That's not how it works in the real world of photojournalism. Even in the caveman days before digital and software, photographers used various techniques to change lighting or contrast. As far as I know, that's always been considered acceptable. Adding or taking away objects is not acceptable.


132 posted on 08/07/2006 11:19:06 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Gone GF

Maybe it's not how it works in real life photojournalism but it's also obvious that they've taken minor photo correcting tools to the extreme, where no one knows what they're really getting.


134 posted on 08/07/2006 11:26:08 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF
Changing contrast in the darkroom was necessary because making a negative used to be only half the process. The other half was making a good print.

Then came reproduction of those images in print which meant adjust contrast for visibility in a newspaper.

The Communists would regularly add or remove figures depending on their standing with the Party.

Intent has been altered before. I offered up 2 books with many examples.

With digital photography, this sort of thing happens more frequently in Western press than it used to happen with images from film.

And it seems to be happening more in the arena of war than in other images.

The LA Times was caught splicing 2 photos together to make a composite image (some figures from one, a different pose of a soldier in another). The resulting image looked like a US soldier (with a rifle) was "halting" a refugee and his son.


And then there was this othe LA Times staffer, a female journalist/activist who has tried to spin events and manipulate perception.

Undercover Photographer: L.A. Times staffer crosses a line, again. [Hugh Hewitt mentioned] (www.NationalReview.com ^ | 05/14/2002)

Little critical attention has been given to the recent antics of Los Angeles Times staff photographer Carolyn Cole, who on May 2 joined a group of "peace activists" who had clandestinely entered Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, in solidarity with the Palestinian militants holding dozens of civilians and clergymen hostage.

Upon her arrival inside the holy site, Cole took on the dual role of photographer and reporter for the Times, offering first-person accounts from within the church.

The Times, often accused of carrying an anti-Israeli grudge, confirmed many of its critics' suspicions by printing Cole's blatantly pro-Palestinian church dispatches. Cole even noted that she felt safer with the Palestinian militants than she did with the Israelis. (A collection of her like-minded photos from inside the church appear in this week's Time.)

And prior to that she'd been arrested in Florida when she attempted to start a "Cuban" riot in Florida by throwing rocks at police when Cubans were protesting Reno's abduction of Ellian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_Cole

137 posted on 08/07/2006 11:41:55 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson