"I have a fairly good digital camera and whatever I download is what I get."
That's not how it works in the real world of photojournalism. Even in the caveman days before digital and software, photographers used various techniques to change lighting or contrast. As far as I know, that's always been considered acceptable. Adding or taking away objects is not acceptable.
Maybe it's not how it works in real life photojournalism but it's also obvious that they've taken minor photo correcting tools to the extreme, where no one knows what they're really getting.
And then there was this othe LA Times staffer, a female journalist/activist who has tried to spin events and manipulate perception.
Undercover Photographer: L.A. Times staffer crosses a line, again. [Hugh Hewitt mentioned] (www.NationalReview.com ^ | 05/14/2002)
Little critical attention has been given to the recent antics of Los Angeles Times staff photographer Carolyn Cole, who on May 2 joined a group of "peace activists" who had clandestinely entered Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, in solidarity with the Palestinian militants holding dozens of civilians and clergymen hostage.Upon her arrival inside the holy site, Cole took on the dual role of photographer and reporter for the Times, offering first-person accounts from within the church.
The Times, often accused of carrying an anti-Israeli grudge, confirmed many of its critics' suspicions by printing Cole's blatantly pro-Palestinian church dispatches. Cole even noted that she felt safer with the Palestinian militants than she did with the Israelis. (A collection of her like-minded photos from inside the church appear in this week's Time.)
And prior to that she'd been arrested in Florida when she attempted to start a "Cuban" riot in Florida by throwing rocks at police when Cubans were protesting Reno's abduction of Ellian.