Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing; Peach
From your Jawa link, scroll down to the most recent post by someone called JMS (9:40 pm) and look at another photo. He/she raised the following issue on another photo:

"A couple of things stick out as being immediately wrong with this photo. First off, look at the line that separates the lower half of the photo and the upper half (where the smoke begins). It looks a bit too perfect and too distinct to be a natural hill top." "More importantly, however, check out the direction of the shadows in the lower portion of the picture. Note that the Sun is behind and to the left of the photographer. Shadows are being cast upwards and backwards of the buildings. However, check the mountain behind the smoke. What's missing? The dark smoke does not appear to be casting any shadow on the mountain behind it. Now, granted, the mountain in the background could be farther away than in appears in the photo, but things just don't seem to add up. "


Smoke rises from Arab Saleem area, near Nabatiyeh, in southern Lebanon during an Israeli air raid, August 2, 2006. (LEBANON)

02 Aug 2006 REUTERS/Adnan Hajj

31 posted on 08/06/2006 7:53:52 PM PDT by bwteim (August 6, 939 --Battle at Simancas, Spain defeats Moors. August 6, 1945 - - Hiroshima.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: bwteim

If that's not the fakest ever. No... they've done worse.
Gives a new meaning to smoke and mirrors. /s


38 posted on 08/06/2006 7:58:28 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: bwteim
Could be, but it looks like the position of the sun is casting the tree shadows in the upper left portion in the same direction of the shadow on the dome and the building near it as well as the building on the left side of the dome in the bottom portion. The shadowy part of the cloud is consistent with the rest of the shadows in the picture as well.

Also, some of the buildings on top of the hill are projecting upwards into the smoke, would would indicate that the top half was not a cut and paste, but may be a legitimate picture. The pixilization of the top part of the landscape next to the smoke is consistent with the fading of sharpness and detail as it should be, compared with the sharper bottom part.

I think I'd give the photo a pass.

65 posted on 08/06/2006 8:25:56 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: bwteim

The critique of this image misses one of the more obvious cues of fakery: perspective. If this is a genuine, undoctored photo, just how large are those trees behind the smoke?


85 posted on 08/06/2006 8:52:45 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson