Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy; cripplecreek
Here is the "correction" per Reuters:

Here is the fake:

The correction is in a yahoo slide show here: "accurate foto"

Although, best I can tell, yahoo is also still happily showing the fake here: 9:03am est

180 posted on 08/06/2006 6:10:35 AM PDT by FreeRadical (Find Terrorists Here: islamicFinder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: FreeRadical
Here's the sad thing: how do we know the "correct" photo is not fake, but just more cleverly photoshopped?

Reuters has NO credibility.

187 posted on 08/06/2006 6:14:32 AM PDT by JCEccles (Reuters: reuting for the success of Islamofascism all day, everyday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: FreeRadical

How do we know that the "accurate" one is not just a prior version of the original doctored photo? Say their were 10 evolutions of the original photo leading to the one that was published and that the so called "accurate" one is one of the 9 evolutions?

The problem this poses is that without a detailed explanation of what happened, all photo;s are now suspect.


358 posted on 08/06/2006 10:19:15 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson