Well, think of all the money we can save by simply not operating on unborn babies in utero. Why bother? Prenatal healthcare? Slash those budgets, too, then fewer parasites will be indulged./sarcasm
At this point, the baby is no longer physically connected to the mother and no longer freeloading its nutrients and oxygen from mommy.
Gee, and I thought the placenta nourished the infant, it's purpose being to nourish baby without depleting mother. It does presume mother is getting proper nourishment herself, but heaven forbid, we focus on properly nourishing the mother rather than focus on the little 'parasite'. I don't think this about many people but I really hope he decides against fatherhood.
If anything, a fetus is merely a parasitical creature that uses the mother as its host.
Gee, aren't we lucky HIS mother chose to nurture her little parasite.
I'll say it again, Mr. Krouse is operating on faulty logic, on many points. In particular, what parasite or tapeworm can continue to thrive and grow once it leaves it's host? Should we just deny food and water to newborns, those little moochers? After all, they can't write brilliant pieces like this author and support themselves?
Also, what parasite is of the same species as its host? This guy is educated beyond his intelligence.