Posted on 08/03/2006 9:23:14 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
What’s the Matter with Kansas?
Dishonest Darwinists -- coming to a state near you.
By David Klinghoffer
-----------------------------------
State school-board elections don’t normally receive much national media attention. Yet the school-board primary race in Kansas on Tuesday, representing a key front in the Darwin wars, was an exception.
Will Darwinism be taught as unquestionable dogma? That’s the question that voters decided. In Kansas, it seems it will.
Kansas has been one of five states with biology curricula that include instruction about the evidence both for and against neo-Darwinism, requiring that students learn about the “critical analysis” of evolutionary theory. Darwin advocates worked hard to defeat the majority on the education board and eliminate this requirement. On Tuesday they succeeded in this first objective, and the second will follow in due course.
The current “controversial” Kansas Science Standards very clearly do not mandate that students learn about intelligent design. On the contrary, as the board explained, “We also emphasize that the Science Curriculum Standards do not include Intelligent Design.”
Can’t get much clearer than, can you? Yet an outfit called Kansas Citizens for Science argued exactly the reverse — that the Kansas Science Standards do indeed mandate instruction about ID. It ended up convincing the voters. Or rather, deceiving them.
It was all part of a campaign, on behalf of liberal candidates for the education board that included other bold falsehoods. For example, the Darwin faction scared Kansas educators with the prospect of being sued on the basis of the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover decision in Pennsylvania. In fact, Kitzmiller is irrelevant to a curriculum in Kansas that does not advocate teaching about ID.
Opponents of the school board’s majority also argued that the science standards represented “science-bashing” by an “anti-science cabal” –- in the words of an editorial in the Witchita Eagle. Hardly. The Kansas standards simply mandated that young people be exposed to a full range of mainstream views from respected scientists.
The silliest objection to be raised was that the Kansas standards — get ready — hurt poor children. As a political-action committee, the Kansas Alliance for Education, put it during the lead-up to the election, “the best chance children, especially those in poverty, have to experience economic self-sufficiency and become tax-paying citizens is to receive a quality education.” According to this PAC, learning to critically analyze scientific evidence is incompatible with a “quality education.”
You would have thought that being able to understand both sides of a scientific issue would be a valuable intellectual experience for anyone to have.
Unfortunately, scare tactics like these persuaded voters to unseat key members of the Kansas board of education. Well, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised. Much the same thing happened in Ohio.
In February, Darwinists succeeded in pressuring that state’s board of education to repeal the Ohio science standard requiring that students, “Describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory.” In Ohio, too, the media warned of the danger to “the future of the nation” from a policy that they said encouraged scientific illiteracy.
The dogmatism and dishonesty of some orthodox Darwinists is simply breathtaking. Yet, having prevailed in Ohio, they triumphed in Kansas and further victories elsewhere may be expected. So it seems increasingly likely that students will be kept in the dark after all about an issue with not only scientific ramifications but critically important moral ones too.
----------------------------------------
David Klinghoffer is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and the author most recently of Why the Jews Rejected Jesus: The Turning Point in Western History.
Clever tag you got there.
...he said, posting on the internet through his computer...
"Again, if you know anything about science history, there are countless examples of science theory being proven wrong after time."
Yes, science theories are revised or proven wrong by *other scientists*. And around and around we go.
Still, Hendrix at least considers the word "science" to be a pejorative. Usually when Creationists want to deliver the ultimate attack on evolution, they call it "religion"
"I just recognize that most of science is junk science, and history has proven this time and time again.
...he said, posting on the internet through his computer..."
Fool, there was no science involved in any of that. That stuff's a result of inventing, which doesn't require science. It's more like, um, well, you think something up and "poof" there you have it.
You are equivalent to a DUmmie who says, "I don't believe that Bush set up a conspiracy to fake the 9/11 attacks, but I think that people should be taught about the flaws in the 'al-Qaeda Theory' of the event."
"Evolution theory could be proven to be wrong."
Could it be proven wrong? Yes, in the sense that anything could be proven wrong. Who knows, eventually the existence of God could be proven wrong. Has it? No. Is it likely? No.
Would you say that you are anti-science?
Perhaps he was bullied by nerds in junior high?
The last visitor we had from Kansas, a Mr. Fred Phelps, informed us we were all going to Hell anyway no matter what we did.
What's the matter with Kansas? Nothing. I live there. Great place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.