Excuse me. The two hold oppsite points of view. Furthermore, when you blast the Schofileld Bible because of Hal Lindsay, it is similar to smearing conservatives because of David Duke.
That's immaterial. They are alike in two respects: that they have FReepers who defend them and they have made embarrassingly wrong predictions.
And it was precisely in those two respects that I compared them.
Furthermore, when you blast the Schofileld Bible because of Hal Lindsay, it is similar to smearing conservatives because of David Duke.
Hal Lindsey isn't a racist - I don't see what the point of this comparison is.
Scofield was a crackpot and Lindsey is a crackpot. Scofield was a huckster and Lindsey is a huckster.