OK I see where you are coming from now. I will bite my tongue. I am more focused on Christ's church - those who have accepted his saving grace, extended to them by no doing of their own - than in arguing what constitutes the cannon and how it should be interpreted.
Seems to me you may be practicing the same fundamental thing you criticize Lahaye of except you are doing it from a different philosophical position.
False prophets have nothing to do with canon law. They're a promised obstacle to the Christianity (both Catholics and Protestants - we have our own share of false prophets who call themselves Catholic!)
I'm not sitting here making money and deciding who's saved and who isn't. It's not my competence, nor is it the competence of a hack novelist. But as the DaVince Code so aptly demonstrated, it's easy to take a little truth, mix it with fanciful fiction, and call it "gospel".
Pretty soon, we're drinking Kool Aid and waiting for comet Hale-Bopp to rapture us to the stars...