[wyattearp]

Interesting that in their spin on things, they included a link to the "current science standards". It was a link not to the "current science standards", but to their talking points about the "current science standards". The current science standards were not present at the link at all.

And they wonder why they are constantly being called [frequent misrepresenters of known facts].

[Deadshot Drifter]

Skimmed over it; that they're still claiming there is a controversy within the science community over evolution is delusional.

The Discovery Institute keeps saying ID, nor the motives behind it, is not religious in nature. But did you notice the link at the bottom of DI senior fellow and supposed scientist, David Klinghoffer's piece? Pimping his latest book..."Why the Jews Rejected Jesus: The Turning Point in Western History "

And what in the world is an orthodox Darwinist?? lmao

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"And they wonder why they are constantly being called [frequent misrepresenters of known facts]."

You can call the Discovery Institute liars here. They aren't FReepers (at least they if they are they haven't said so). It's only against the rules to call FReepers liars.