Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

Ok. It wont let me post this, so I'll have to post it in two pieces. Hope that's ok. If I try to quote, it only allows the quote, and not the reply.

I was a Naval Electronic Warfare Technician. I was going by what you said. Antennae can either radiate or receive. If they are radiating, then they can be detected. If they are merely receiving, then they can take no action on the signal that they are receiving. That's all that I was saying.


57 posted on 08/01/2006 1:05:48 AM PDT by wyattearp (Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: wyattearp
Greetings fellow Veteran,

I'm not saying I understand the concept, but if my physics class serves me rightly, Can't light waves be neutralized like other waves by an equal frequency wave traveling in the opposite direction? As I understand it, the major difficulty would be the constant adjustments required for angle, frequency, etc. Also, what if these antennae only produce a thin field around the aircraft? Not possible according to your knowledge? OK, I agree, it seems futuristic, but I remind you that the F-117s were combat operational in 1980; many years before the world knew we even were working on them!
I think it very interesting that "scientists" are starting to talk to the public about the possibility of invisibility, sort of like they did about radar-stealth in 1979!
BTW, what do you think all those UFO geeks are taking pictures of up at Groom Lake? Aliens?!!

Aurora is big, very fast (3000+mph), and...seems to "disappear" in a blink.

62 posted on 08/01/2006 9:57:28 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( ISLAMA DELENDA NECCES EST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson