To: This is a lame ID
Your response to the question only shows that you don't really understand it. That principle cannot, by definition be relied on as a result of "evidence." It is an assumption about the nature of the universe, not of the "evidence" we have attained about it.
You are correct. That assumption is the core axiom of science, without which it would be impossible to make meaningful statements. A better phrasing would have been "Do you believe this to be an invalid position?"
I note that you ignored the rest of my questions. Why is this?
50 posted on
07/30/2006 4:35:19 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson