Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: This is a lame ID
Your response to the question only shows that you don't really understand it. That principle cannot, by definition be relied on as a result of "evidence." It is an assumption about the nature of the universe, not of the "evidence" we have attained about it.

You are correct. That assumption is the core axiom of science, without which it would be impossible to make meaningful statements. A better phrasing would have been "Do you believe this to be an invalid position?"

I note that you ignored the rest of my questions. Why is this?
50 posted on 07/30/2006 4:35:19 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson