Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is Their Plan for Social Security?
Cato Institute ^ | July 28, 2006 | Michael D. Tanner

Posted on 07/28/2006 2:27:39 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/28/2006 2:27:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; ...

PING!


2 posted on 07/28/2006 2:28:31 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
PONG!

free dixie,sw

3 posted on 07/28/2006 2:31:31 PM PDT by stand watie ( Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. -----T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Kean denied the charge

Too bad.

4 posted on 07/28/2006 2:34:33 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Yeah I'm screwed unless someone figures out a way to solve this issue. Being 19 and now with an internship, paying into the social security fund I realize that I will probably never see that money again...
5 posted on 07/28/2006 2:34:46 PM PDT by gth833s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Are they willing to give workers more choice, ownership and control over their retirement funds?

Are they willing to tell workers that the "Social Security" tax is just another tax, and that workers have ABSOLUTELY no claim to the tax that they paid into the "Social Security Trust Fund"?

Didn't think so.

Congress is NOT your friend.

6 posted on 07/28/2006 2:35:11 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gth833s

Welcome to FR.


7 posted on 07/28/2006 2:37:19 PM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gth833s
http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html

Flemming V. Nestor: [Nestor] appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling,The Supremes reject this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not [a] contractual right.

The minute the government gets it, it's theirs. You're pwn3d, baby (and so am I!).

8 posted on 07/28/2006 2:40:22 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Absoultely. The Trust Fund is a cruel joke. The only way to pay off one of the "bonds" in that filing cabinet is to take it out of tax revenue. Will an administration at that time be enlightened enough to realize that a DROP in rate will be what yields the RISE in revenue to afford the redemption?


9 posted on 07/28/2006 2:41:20 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Occupation does not cause terrorism; terrorism causes occupation. (A. Dershowitz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I would love to take the money I pay in SS yearly (not that much since I am 19) and put it in my Roth IRA. Make it work for me.

Here's my option: SS opt-out. Once you do, you cannot go back. That way, the people who do not want social security when they reach retirement age can do whatever the hell the want with the money and it's on them. Smart people will invest it, stupid people will buy, buy, buy and then complain once they reach retirement age.


10 posted on 07/28/2006 2:43:50 PM PDT by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I realize that. Something would be done if people didn't rely on it for retirement and as I understand it the people receiving the SS benefits also have the time (retirees) to go out in vote. No politician is going to anger that.

Its funny though; my uber liberal friends actually agree with me that SS needs to reform... its about all we agree on.

Now if we could get some guts to solve the problem.

Meanwhile, I'll just think of it as repaying my grandma for all her generous donations over the years.
11 posted on 07/28/2006 2:45:56 PM PDT by gth833s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

The only solution for Socialist Security is to dismantle the whole thing. Cease all new "contributions" paid to the government by employees and employers. Offer everyone a lump sum payment consisting of accumulate employee contributons and employer contributons, plus accrued interest. Most people under about 50 years of age would take the lump sum. This would provide $$$billions in private capital to the economy, as people invest their money. Older people would probably stay with SS, so it would take 20-30 years to completely unwind this socialist ponzi scheme.

Democrats/Socialists and fake capitalists will all say this is impossible.


12 posted on 07/28/2006 2:46:19 PM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abercrombie_guy_38
Amen,

I would much rather put it in an IRA. Compound interest is much more beneficial than anything the SS fund could ever offer. At least for our age.
13 posted on 07/28/2006 2:47:59 PM PDT by gth833s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gth833s

That's why Socialist Insecurity should be an opt-in plan: whoever is willing to take the risk can pay the task. The rest of us will build up REAL retirement funds. );-)


14 posted on 07/28/2006 2:48:06 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Just like the gasoline situation the politicians know it is happening but refuse to do a thing about it. Bush was on the money about Social Security and this nation has known since the late seventies we had an energy problem. But the liberals in America own the Democrat Party and all they want is Controversy,Crap and Confusion while Castro is digging for oil off the Florida coast.The Democrats have refused to allow a refinery to be built in Amercia in the last 30 years and all they can do is bitch and moan while their hot air pollutes America worse than the SUV's they drive and complain about. They complain about big business while they were padding their pockets with the "Big Dig".Their spots show to all that can see but about half of America is blind and uneducated.


15 posted on 07/28/2006 2:48:32 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud

I'd be happy with a transition to personal retirement accounts, state control (as opposed to federal control), and conversion to an opt-in/opt-out program. I would opt out in a heartbeat (I'm 39). :-)


16 posted on 07/28/2006 2:51:57 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do they favor raising taxes? Do they want to cut benefits? Are they willing to give workers more choice, ownership and control over their retirement funds?

The only fix the Democrats can get away with without offending and alienating their base is means testing for both Social Security and Medicare with no other reform at all. Classic soak the "rich" who will turn out to be those who planned and invested in their own retirement.

17 posted on 07/28/2006 2:52:27 PM PDT by JimSEA (America cannot have an exit strategy from the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah

I always laughed at my Bio Teacher in high school. She ran a club called the environmental awareness club. Meanwhile, she drove a jeep which had poor gas mileage.


18 posted on 07/28/2006 2:52:35 PM PDT by gth833s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
task = tax d-oh!
19 posted on 07/28/2006 2:52:38 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah

Certain "Republicans" don't want us drilling near FL either.


20 posted on 07/28/2006 2:54:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson