Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hc87

I agree with you although I was less inclined to continue subscribing. They just had nothing real to offer. The sound quality was much better than FM, but the offerings were very little over what I hear on the radio.

For example: the 80s station played Duran Duran (some of their worst stuff, incidentally) plus a lot of nobodies. I swear to you I heard a ton of so-called music I haven't heard before on there, and if I can out in the '80s and I'm not familiar with it, it wasn't worth anything. Not saying that I had to like it, but I heard virtually everything that came out that sold more than, say, 100 copies. I would listen for a couple of hours and not hear a song I was familiar with.


18 posted on 07/27/2006 1:17:50 PM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: 1L

I had the same experience with the '80s channel. My impression was that it had a "real" '80s playlist for the first 6 months I had the service and then switched to a "any junk we can find recorded between 1980 and 1989" playlist.

Still, the occasional trips to the Bluegrass and Alternative (Lucy, Fred) stations would have made it worth renewal at $8 or so bucks a month. A bit more if they had added a dedicated Louisiana Music Channel (New Orleans-style jazz, Cajun, Zydeco).


51 posted on 07/27/2006 2:02:04 PM PDT by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson