Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU

The land border is shorter but the seacoast is waayy
longer.

Absorbing Mexico would gain us little more than another
New Mexico with crooked politicos and mostly dirtpoor
ill-educated peasants.

Better to absorb say, Taiwan or Singapore.


58 posted on 07/24/2006 11:41:45 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: rahbert

I don't know.

It has its positive aspects. We have a damn long seacoast altready..

With Mexico in our pockets, maybe we could turn the entire Gulf and Pacific coastline of that place into tourist meccas.

The European would flock there for upscale, safe, trendy resorts and empoy the Mexicans.


61 posted on 07/24/2006 12:30:39 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: rahbert

I don't know.

It has its positive aspects. We have a damn long seacoast already..

With Mexico in our pockets, maybe we could turn the entire Gulf and Pacific coastline of that place into tourist meccas.

The Europeans would flock there for upscale, safe, trendy resorts, and they would employ the Mexicans at better jobs. Mexico has oil, minerals and a lot of women who look like Jennifer Lopez.

All it needs is some good American capitalism to make the economy there hum and flush out the crooks.

Its a thought anyway and better than what we're getting. We don't have the cake and we can't eat it either.


62 posted on 07/24/2006 12:35:49 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson