Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dianna
Your problem is that you have claimed a level of supervision that is totally impossible

See my post 73. I'm assuming that most parents are smart enough to control their kids. When mine got too big for the carts, they were either in the basket or holding the pocket of my jeans. The MINUTE they let go I knew it and they were back by my side where they belonged. As they got older, when Hubby was along, he'd say, "where do your hands belong?". My boys put their hands in their pockets and stayed beside us.

593 posted on 07/24/2006 5:03:29 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW
Well, I apologise. When you repeatedly said that the mother should NEVER have taken her eyes off the child, I inferred that you NEVER took your eyes off your children.

Clearly, you agree that that is impossible since you felt it necessary to have physical contact with your children at all times.

Yet, you cannot respond whether or not it is possible that the mother turned her head away for a moment when the mirror fell. Would the child have been safer if the mother had ahold of his hand? Certainly, well, unless they were both standing in front of the mirror.

My children were inclined to behave themselves. I didn't find it necessary to clutch them to me at all times. They survived. Most children do. This accident may have occurred because the mother was not watching her child closely enough. It may have occurred even though the mother was as vigilant as most people and the child behaving perfectly. We just don't know. I'm willing to admit that. Are you?

607 posted on 07/24/2006 5:23:41 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson