No it's your problem. The child was not being watched by the Mom. The police say the child was playing near the mirror. Since no one was watching, no one saw if the child was bumping it, pulling on it or something else. At any rate, it wasn't made to be played with in anyway.
The tunnel was meant to be driven through.
Two separate issues.
Where in the article does it say the mother was not wathcing her child? Where does it say that the child was pulling or even touching the mirror? You don't have enough facts to draw these conclusions.
When I was in college I worked at South Coast Plaza in Costa Mesa. One day we heard this horrble crash followed by the sound of breaking glass. One entire glass plate window had fallen off the facade of the Gucci store into a main thoroughfare of the mall. It was near multiple benches where mother's stopped with their children to have a rest, etc. It was amazing that no one was injurred or worse.
Can you not see how these things can happen when parents and kids are simply doing normal things? And if someone had been hurt, Gucci would have absolutely been liable for it.
The issues of the mirror and the tunnel panel are similar IF one contends that both the mirror and the panel were installed incorrectly.