"...From my post HERE. Checking the "properties" on the graphic indicates it came from the University of Arizona geosciences dept library..."
Your post #177 doesn't have a graphic in it.
It doesn't?! But yet you can see it in post #220??? That's odd. The identical graphic apppears in each. For the record, the address of the pic: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/Antevs/ecol438/sealevl.gif
BTW, does a "gap" appear in the text on #177 where a graphic might be?
(((scratching head)))
Gotta run til this evening.
I've got too many irons in the fire so re my #225: A cursory reading(due to lack of alertness) of what appears to be something akin to an executive summary(?); this study seems to indicate there has been very little "uplift" in the particular area of So Carolina they looked at. Your thoughts?