Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake; baynut; blam; SunkenCiv; gleeaikin
Here's a view of a couple of well-respected USGS geologists, concerning dating of bays vs bay rims:

Markewich, H. W., and William Markewich. 1994. An Overview of Pleistocene and Holocene Inland Dunes in Georgia and the Carolinas--Morphology, Distribution, Age, and Paleoclimate U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin #2069.

p. 25. While studying the Pleistocene fluvial and marine stratigraphy of the Cape Fear River valley, Markewich and Soller (1983) and Soller (1988) suggested that Carolina bays formed between 60 ka and 200 ka, thus supporting Frey's (1951) estimate of 100 ka for Singletary Lake, a large bay in the Cape Fear River valley. Soller (1988) considered it probable that some of the older dunes [poster's note: the authors are referring here to large, amorphous or dune-and-kettle type dunes on the northeastern terraces of coastal blackwater streams, not to bay rims] were formed contemporaneously with the Carolina bays, and that the younger dunes [poster's note: these "younger dunes" include bay rims] greatly postdated the bays, and that some dunes were as young as 5 ka.

This dune dating makes sense to me. While working in Marlboro County, SC, I found an Indian artifact about 3 feet down in one of those "younger dunes" along the Great Pee Dee River, which allowed me to date the dune to around 4500 BC.

213 posted on 08/10/2006 5:59:18 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake; baynut; blam; SunkenCiv; gleeaikin

Oops, "dune-and-kettle" should have read, "knob-and-kettle". Sorry for the typo.


214 posted on 08/10/2006 6:00:56 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson