Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky Dog
100% of cancer can be linked to breathing and consumption of water. Only people who breathe and consume water have been found to die of cancer. Therefore, breathing and consuming water are risky activities and should be banned.

Statistics can be used to 'prove' virtually anything. There are liars, damned liars, and statisticians.

I am not arguing that smoking, or being fat are necessarily good for you, just that at some point, insurance companies can find an excuse to not insure anyone, or at least raise their rates--especially if enough 'studies' are conducted.

The time honored method has been to insure most, risk assess the members of the pool and charge accordingly, and to give premium discounts to those who are less of a risk.

I think anyone who feels obesity should be 'punished' should dig up the BMI numbers and check where they are. When I was 18, I was 6'1" and weighed 240, but there was no way anyone who looked at me would have considered me 'fat'. The BMI chart (ancestor of today's formula) would have had me morbidly obese.

42 posted on 07/20/2006 5:55:02 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

You're not trying to argue that people who smoke don't get lung cancer at higher rates than non-smokers are you?


63 posted on 07/20/2006 6:29:14 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe
Using your rationale, everyone who is now dead was, at one time, alive and everyone who is now alive will, at some time in the future, be dead. Consequently, no one should have any health or life insurance as the ultimate result is inevitable.

The time honored method has been to insure most, risk assess the members of the pool and charge accordingly, and to give premium discounts to those who are less of a risk.

Exactly how do you think insruance companies "risk assess the members of the pool?" It couldn't be via the means of statistical analysis, could it?

Naw... After all... Statistics can be used to 'prove' virtually anything. There are liars, damned liars, and statisticians.
81 posted on 07/20/2006 7:32:52 AM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson