Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tammy8

I'd like to see you link that post where you think that Rebel was critical of the US Navy.

I've read all his posts and haven't seen that. As to his being ticked off at the State Department, he'll have to get in line on that one. The State Dept. ticks most of us off for far less serious issues than this. LOL


1,057 posted on 07/19/2006 6:07:41 PM PDT by Peach (Prayers for our dear friends in Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies ]


To: Peach; rebel_yell2; DvdMom

It seems everyone pretty much agrees that he was blaming Israel so I won't bother with all his bashing and second guessing them. Also I would like to note that many said he was right to be angry about no updates on SD website- rebel posted several SD updates- didn't he get them off SD website? From what I could tell Rebel was complaining because SD was not contacting him personally or updating info daily (could it be they at times had no update from previous info?)

At bottom are rebels posts that ticked me and many others off; not all that set me on edge mind you, but many. We can agree to disagree- I really don't care if you don't see it the way I do.

Mind you he was continually told by those with military background that detailed planning and diplomacy had to be done before successful US Military rescue, and was reminded of possibility of attack on US rescue by Hez. Yet he was still critical of Navy's slowness to respond- BTW since the Marines are w/Navy ships those close to Marines naturally got their hackles up too. It is pretty clear he expected Navy bringing Marines to drop everything and rush in to get him, would not let others explain logistics of operation to him.

I also copied his references to being held hostage by Israel, that was over the top.

Everything that follows was posted by Rebel:

The Iwo Jima battle group was in the Red Sea last Wednesday when this all started. Contingency planning might suggest beginning to move it through the Suez Canal and toward Lebanon a bit quicker?

Actually, all they really need to get started is a destroyer or two and a couple of chartered cruise ships. That is what is happening today, six days later.

I am unhappy about being held hostage by a foreign government.

I love all of these "I told you so" tsk-tskers who are so unsympathetic to fellow citizens who are being held hostage by a foreign government. The funny thing is that it isn't Hizbollah that prevents us from leaving Beirut; it is our staunchest ally.

Let me point out that the Iwo Jima amphibious landing group is STILL in the Red Sea, seven days after this thing began. You have to START moving a ship before it can get somewhere.

Can someone explain to me (real slow because I'm real slow) why the Iwo Jima and its amphibious landing ship cohorts, which have been in the Red Sea for the past seven days, were only dispatched to the Lebanese coast today, and won't be here until Thursday? This sounds like the work of the same contingency planners that work at State; a day late and a dime short.

But then Israel took close to 100,000 foreign nationals hostage by bombing Beirut airport and imposing a blockade.


1,097 posted on 07/19/2006 7:57:30 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Build a Real Border Fence, and secure the border!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson