To: dmd25
I heard Rush say that, but I don't think so.
I think he's just the same in private as he is in public, only less 'guarded.'
Remember when that 'friend' of his revealed his secret tapes, and the media was panting as they awaited this revelation of the secret Bush.............and he was the same good man in private as he is in public.
I think it ended the good name of the 'friend' though.....
168 posted on
07/17/2006 8:22:11 PM PDT by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
To: ohioWfan
I agree with you. I don't think they knew they were being overheard--I just thought it was interesting that Rush was making that point.
One of the wonderful things about GWB is he is who he is. He has a firm foundation. Perhaps he was less guarded with PM Blair, but I really don't think anyone would really hold that against him. If you and I can not get upset with him for his language, there can't be too many others who would! :)I don't think there was anything to apologize for.
I do remember that tape incident. I don't suspect that friend has been at the WH lately!
172 posted on
07/17/2006 8:28:48 PM PDT by
dmd25
To: ohioWfan
I think he's just the same in private as he is in public, only less 'guarded.'I think so too and that is one reason I like him. I was disgusted with Nixon's profanity in private. Nixon certainly was not the same in private as he was in public. But I am sure President is the same in private because of his good character.
179 posted on
07/17/2006 8:37:49 PM PDT by
tommix2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson