Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurbankKarl; bnelson44

Oh..okay, sure that makes sense...

Like I told bnelson...so many different opinions on TV..and you mix in my ignorance about all things military..and it makes for a lot of confusion...LOL

I DID enjoy the video of the tanks, thanks.


2,273 posted on 07/17/2006 9:09:04 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2265 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth

To add to Karl's excellent response, if you scatter mines about willy-nilly, your own guys are more likely to...find them...than the enemy. That's why mines are laid in belts, with positions carefully noted. (A systemic downside of minefields is that whoever loses is usually not in a position to publish the location of their mines, or to defuse or remove them, making "winning" a potentially dual edged sword).

In Iraq, the IEDs are not laid in fields, they are widely scattered around the country, and often triggered by remote control when a target of interest passes by.

For these reasons and the ones Karl mentioned, minefields are much easier to defeat than an assymetrical insurgency.


2,298 posted on 07/17/2006 9:21:14 PM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson