Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield
It occurs to me, that Israel could have placed a cheap, 3" thick, iron-or-steel decoy, about 50 meters to starboard of that boat, and It would have absorbed the impact of the missile. Why didn't they do this??

Have you tried to place an order at the 3" Thick Iron Or Steel Decoy Works, LTD?

They are a year backlogged!

44 posted on 07/15/2006 3:45:20 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

I heard there's a sale going on at the ACME website.

Wait. Those are only 2" thick and made out of plywood.






57 posted on 07/15/2006 3:56:35 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

It wouldn't be too hard to make a planing-hull catamaran, with a steel cutout on top that mimicked the profile of the Israeli frigate, and run it alongside the ship. Probably a couple of 600-horse diesels would do for power. Heck, it would probably even be possible to make it out of wood with a steel exoskeleton, to give a radar signature.

Four or five or six of these could surround the actual frigate, to provide cover. It would be the same defensive strategy as small fish use in schooling. Cheap, and effective.


79 posted on 07/15/2006 4:16:20 PM PDT by Renfield (If Gene Tracy was the entertainment at your senior prom, YOU might be a redneck...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson