Posted on 07/14/2006 4:02:49 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
Target is putting plans to build three South Side stores "on hold" -- and making veiled threats to close existing Chicago stores -- if the City Council mandates wage and benefit standards for "big-box" retailers, African-American aldermen warned Thursday.
The saber-rattling is intensifying as the clock winds down toward a July 26 showdown vote on plans to make Chicago the nation's first major city to establish a "living wage" for stores with at least 90,000 square feet of space operated by retailers with $1 billion in sales.
Minneapolis-based Target becomes the second retailing giant to threaten to pull out of the lucrative Chicago market in a last-ditch effort to stop an ordinance championed by organized labor that breezed through the City Council's Finance Committee 15-6 and has attracted support from 33 aldermen.
WAGE WAR
The current federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour. Illinois' minimum wage is $6.50
Most Chicago area Wal-Mart employees average $10.99 an hour, with just a few making the starting wage of $7.25 an hour, Wal-Mart spokesman John Bisio recently said.
As of 2004, Target in many cities had a starting salary of about $7 an hour, published reports said. A few Target workers outside Illinois said they recently started with salaries as low as $6.25 an hour, according to postings on the Target Union! (www.targetunion.org) Web site for store employees.
Wal-Mart has threatened to cancel plans to build as many as 20 Chicago stores over the next five years if retailers are required to pay employees at least $10 an hour and $3 in benefits by July 1, 2010.
'It would be devastation for us'
Mayor Daley is taking the threat seriously. He has challenged aldermen who oppose Wal-Mart's 20-store expansion to describe how they would replace the 8,000 lost jobs.
Target failed to return calls on the admonition communicated to aldermen of the 5th, 9th and 34th wards in recent days. Target real estate executive Chris Case was scheduled to meet with African-American aldermen Thursday, but the meeting was canceled because of scheduling conflicts.
Ald. Carrie Austin (34th) said a Target pullout would be devastating to the 32-acre shopping mall at 119th and Marshfield that developers had hoped to build, with help from a $23 million city subsidy. Home Depot would likely follow Target out the door. As many as 1,000 jobs would be lost, Austin said.
"It would be devastation for us. Our largest employer in the 34th Ward is the Police Department. The second-largest for us would be Jewel. We have no other resources," Austin said.
Referring to the anti-Wal-Mart movement that gave birth to the big-box ordinance, Austin said, "If you want to bully up on Wal-Mart, you've got to bring in the other ones, and damned if you do on them. If they suffer from it, too bad. If you want to control Wal-Mart, you should go about that a different way."
Accused of 'bullying tactics'
Ald. Leslie Hairston (5th) said she has a letter of intent from Target to build a new store at Marquette and Stony Island in her ward. But the developer has told her the store is "on hold" and that Target may close existing Chicago stores if the big-box ordinance goes through.
Hairston called it little more than a scare tactic. And even if the threat turns out to be real, she's standing firm in support of organized labor.
"Wal-Mart and Target could pay their people a living wage. Then we wouldn't have this problem, and people could actually live on the money they made," Hairston said.
Ald. Joe Moore (49th), chief sponsor of the big-box ordinance, accused Target and Wal-Mart of using "bullying tactics" to stop a train that has already left the station.
"It's an idle threat. ... They're clearly trying to ... intimidate members of the City Council. I am very hopeful that members will hold firm. ... The votes are still there," Moore said. He predicted 33 votes for the ordinance, "maybe more," even though Daley has been buttonholing aldermen to try to stop it.
Ald. Howard Brookins (21st) is still searching for a big-box retailer to replace the Wal-Mart his colleagues nixed at 83rd and Stewart.
Brookins said Wal-Mart executives have told him they may take the lead of the riverboat casinos that ring Chicago and run free shuttle buses to their suburban stores if the big-box ordinance passes.
"I don't know if it was in jest, but they did say it. ... That is an option that they could employ. They could set up locations to have pickup and dropoff. I don't think that is that farfetched," Brookins said.
fspielman@suntimes.com
If you are agreeing that there are just two alternatives then you are about as wrong as a person can get.
Most of my family worked two jobs most of their early years till they worked their way into higher paying jobs or opened businesses.
They never relied on the government to mandate them prosperity they used the American system to achieve it for themselves.
I'm a small business owner.
My point is that the days of getting paid $60,000 to screw a bolt on a car is over.
The only place where you can get paid that kind of money for doing a Burger King level job is at the Post Office.
Whatever comrade....
Have a quick question out of curiosity for Chicagoans on this thread, any idea as to what the Casino's starting pay is for an equal type employee as to skills, education?
I have no idea what the casinos pay, sorry I can't help.
I did not mean to imply there are ONLY two alternatives, though I can see where my language would give someone that impression.
Other posters before me had offered other alternatives, such as living with roomates, so I didn't go into them. My point was just to show how unfair and counterproductive it is to try to save money by forcing employers to pay higher wages.
Well, just start a subsidiary "Target of Illinois". I'm sure it would have under a billion in sales.
John D - you are living in the past.
Skilled Worker requirements are a joke. Corps want a warm body cheap. Minimal skills? OK, you're hired and you'll learn - maybe.
I think the taxes that you are figuring in are not accurate. This person may be someone who pays no tax, or even gets an earned income credit.
I think they could raise money and still sell cheaper then the competition, assuming there is any is some of these wards.
Ah...hey Brilliant..you better get a new name. : ()
"Will and Kendall counties are waiting..."
Yep. Put 'em on the county line.
Yep, there are all sorts of wierd building designs created to adapt to goofy laws.
Then there is the 700 cc japanese motorcycles that used to be 750 cc, shrunk to avoid big engine tariffs.
POST #34 WELL SAID!
"Referring to the anti-Wal-Mart movement that gave birth to the big-box ordinance, Austin said, "If you want to bully up on Wal-Mart, you've got to bring in the other ones, and damned if you do on them. If they suffer from it, too bad. If you want to control Wal-Mart, you should go about that a different way."
Ain't it telling as to how many of these Dem pols (and in Chicago, every alderman is a RAT save one) think it is their JOB to CONTROL buisness and people and act as the gatekeepers for all progress? This city and the whole county of Cook is just one big Soviet.
"blackmail the city"?????// ROFL.....what the heck do they think they are doing to these companies?
Interesting that I agree with the labor lawyer that the Maryland law will be overturned. I have no doubt about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.