[tallhappy]

I felt Derbyshire captured the ferment of activity in bioinformatics exactly.

Very interesting. I thought that that was the weakest because this ferevncy which is there (yes yes yes!!!) really has nothing to do with this crevo debate and is well beyond anything either side is talking about.

In reality the "ferment of activity" is being and will be very negative to traditional what can be called cannonical evolutionary theory. In other words it is wrong. This will allow anti-evolutionists to use these finding later to detract from evolution and the same argument will go on forever.

I bolded the key part.

[DanDenDar]

In reality the "ferment of activity" is being and will be very negative to traditional what can be called cannonical evolutionary theory.

Copuld you please give an example of this. Be as specific as possible.