Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

Maybe you should read Darwin. His work was never meant to bear such a heavy theoretical load.


184 posted on 07/14/2006 9:32:30 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
It certainly does if you count longevity as part of a "track record".

Name any major feature of evolution theory not anticipated by Darwin.

It is true that he didn't anticipate DNA or genetics, but he accurately described the attributes of inheritance. He knew that there were features that were affected by the environment during development, and he knew that there were features that were controlled by some hidden code in the sperm and egg. He mistakenly believed that the inherited code could be affected by the individual's experience.

He was correct on some things and incorrect on others, but he anticipated and discussed nearly every concept in evolution.

193 posted on 07/14/2006 10:49:09 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson