Which is an outright lie according to every historical source on the debates of the issue. One you should know better by now than to try and repeat. We point out that the Founders meant "no free man shall be debarred the use of arms" and you come back with some crap about the States being able to ignore the Constitution that they are subject to.
You are the one upholding the Brady logic used by the Courts to restrict RKBA.
Fine. Give me a link to one source that says the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution was to protect this individual right.
You can't. All hat and no cattle. That's you. See ya later.