Total bull bobbie. - You and I have been arguing this issue in detail since you first started spouting the "collective rights" line, years ago.
-- I've probably 'cited' at one time or another virtually every fact contained in reports like these:
WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.
Is this what you're relying on?
I'm citing the FACTS in such reports, bobbie, versus the "collective" opinions you spout from sources like the ACLU.
You ARE aware that some future liberal Presidency can have their Justice Department write their own interpretation. What then, tpaine?
Then bobbie, - depending on how you people ~act~ upon your "interpretations", it may be time [as Claire Wolfe put it] to straighten you collectivists out.
You're saying that you believe the Executive Branch of the federal government when they tell you what your rights are when it comes to arms?
Don't hype me bob. The facts noted in that report are valid, regardless of who 'tells' them.
Kinda like putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop, doncha think?
Cute.
That's it! That's all you got! What kind of an argument is that?
Indeed, what more can be said? -- You rant opinions, make cute comments, --- while I quote the facts about our constitution.
The Second Amendment unquestionably protects the right of individual Americans to own firearms.
I wonder if qouting a currrent Senator would be good as Amicus for a defense? Not that I am currently doing anything wrong. To the best of my knowledge, all my stuff is "legal".