Replies

The Nazi analogy is not irrelevant. Many major corporations in the thirties and forties did support and cooperate with the Nazis (IBM and Ford Motor Company among them). Of course, now they regret it and issue apologies but a lot of good that does. Six million plus bodies are underground already (as are the bodies of many men with homosexual leanings who contracted AIDS). Mineralman, though he lives in error, has a certain point. Business entities are inherently amoral. My conclusion is a different one: It is up to us as consumers to speak out.

In our time, it is fashionable for major corporations to be "gay friendly." This despite the fact that the "Gay" rights movement is spreading dangerous falsehoods and myths, has made it virtually impossible to get psychiatric treatment for homosexuality (even if the client wishes it) and has created a "gay" subculture which was the breeding ground for the AIDS epidemic in the United Sates and continues to lock men and women in a destructive and dangerous lifestyle.

I work for a Fortune 100 company that is very "Gay" friendly. Sometimes I swallow my pride as I read announcements of corporate sponsored "Gay" events or diversity seminars, but I need the paycheck. The Christian Radio Host who is advocating the boycott is doing the right thing. True if this is a popular chain it may not have much effect, but he can go to his grave knowing he did was was right in his lifetime.

Homosexuality is really nothing more than a perverted sex fetish. Why any company feels the need to donate money to promote this fetish is beyond me. It'd look pretty ridiculous if there was a rally for people who use battery operated dildos during sex and some grocery chain donated money to it. Why do companies donate money to homosexual causes? Because it's fashionable and political. Not because it's a worthy cause such as a cancer charity or children's home, or even a public interest issue such as building a new stadium.

Homosexuality is political because it's in your face. And it's in your face because homosexuals themselves know that their conduct is perverted and unnatural. Once homosexuality gets out of the closet, it goes crazy like this because its adherents need constant psychological reinforcement. Adulterers don't hold pride rallies. Heterosexuals who live together outside of marriage don't demand to march under a "cohabitation" banner at the St. Patrick's Day parade. There aren't special film festivals for movie directors who are promiscuous. But homosexuals do all those things and more. There are gay pride rallies, demands for gay banners in parades, and special film festivals for homo directors.

Why? Because adultery, fornication, and promiscuity may be sinful by the standards of many faiths, but they aren't literally unnatural. But homosexuality **IS** unnatural. When it's closeted, homosexuals simply accept that they're not normal and go about their perverted business discretely, leaving everyone else alone. But once homosexuals are told that their conduct is not only normal, but good (a source of PRIDE), they become extremely aggressive against the population in general, and children in particular.

Nothing in nature confirms the idea that homosexuality is just as good and just as normal as heterosexuality. Everything from the birth of a child to the mating dance of whooping cranes to two male rams butting heads to "impress" a female demonstrates the perverseness of homosexuality. Even homosexual acts remind homos of their perverseness, because one "partner" has to play the role of the opposite sex.

So, once told that their behavior is normal, they need constant reinforcement of that belief or they'll notice how silly their belief is. They're like the emperor in "The Emperor's New Clothes". A single dissenting voice can remind them that they're nude, or in their case, that they're perverts. So uncloseted homosexuals go on a rampage to crush all dissent, to wallow in their homosexuality 24/7 (Bruce isn't just a tax accountant, he's a gay tax accountant who belongs to the gay tax accountants' association, and who demands that gay pride be celebrated daily by his accounting firm), and to propagate their behavior to children. We see this latter nonsense in California, where the homosexual lobby is demanding that homosexual heroes and role models be presented to kids in their curricula and textbooks. This is as ludicrous as presenting them with heroes and role models who were wife swappers, but it's "fashionable". And it's fashionable because it's political, and that's why these companies stupidly give money to it. The irony is that if homosexuality wasn't unnatural, homosexuals wouldn't worry about being identified and celebrated as homosexuals. They'd just quietly carry out their sexual habits in private, like adulterers and fornicators do, and like still-closeted perverts such as people who like animals do. But if the animal sex crowd ever gets out of the closet, they'll behave just like homosexuals, and demand special pride days, special floats in parades, access to kids, etc. Polygamists won't, though, because their behavior, while not good in my opinion, isn't literally an attack on nature.

This grocery chain should be ashamed for donating to this ridiculous and destructive movement.