Replies

"Olbermann showed fascination with a passage from Dean's book which suggested that "neoconservatives and many Republicans" might be willing to deliberately "provoke potential terrorists" in order "to maintain influence and control of the presidency."

Olbermann continued: "That's ominous not just in the sense that authoritarians involved in conservatism and now Republicanism would politicize counterterror here, which we've already argued that point on many occasions. But are you actually saying here they would set up, encourage terrorism from other countries to set them up as a bogeyman to have again that group to hate here, that group to more importantly afraid of here?"

Is there a pair of dimwits anywhere, more clueless than these two and do they really believe the hate-filled garbage they spew or is their rhetoric simply to advance their liberal agenda?

Either way, its sad and disgusting to see anyone even suggesting such a crass and baseless accusation.

Yes, "we" (Conservatives) actually "invited" this response to our actions (whatever they might have been?) and most definetly "provoked" our enemy in attacking us on many occasions, in many places, including 9/11.

YES, WE (CONSERVATIVE) BROUGHT THIS ON OURSELVES.
WE "PROVOKED IT", DON'T YOU KNOW, SIMPLY TO RETAIN POWER

It's a well worn tactic of the left, they dehumanize their political opponents in order to induce hatred, fear, and violence.

Since they cannot win policy arguments, they incite radicalism, its done all over the world.

Islamic cults do the same to Jews and infidels in general, they dehumanize them in order to make us easier for their children and followers to kill.