Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

Wouldn't those examples be natural selection, not evolution?


10 posted on 07/09/2006 9:33:25 PM PDT by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
Wouldn't those examples be natural selection, not evolution?

Natural selection works on the range of variation within a population.

That range of variation is supported by mutations.

If a change, say in climate, occurs, one end of a range (for example, skin color) may be slightly favored over the other end. Hot climate favors darker skin, low sunlight favors lighter skin up to a point.

Over time the range of variation within that trait expands again (its like a bell curve). In this way populations can adapt to changing conditions, as long as conditions don't change too fast.

This change over time is called evolution.

11 posted on 07/09/2006 9:41:33 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: puroresu

...or simple adaptation...


19 posted on 07/09/2006 10:45:54 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah" = Satan in disguise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: puroresu
Wouldn't those examples be natural selection, not evolution?

I don't think you know what you're talking about.

Evolution = variation + selection

I gather you accept selection. Do you think variation does not exist?

29 posted on 07/10/2006 5:40:13 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson