Posted on 07/09/2006 11:16:25 AM PDT by TomServo
Couldn't welfare be considered slavery reparations?
Why am I not suprised?
The democrats should pay, because Jim Crow laws were passed solely by democrats both north and south.
After the credits for all the social spending the last 40 years, they will owe the country.
It will never happen but I hope the democratics runs with this idea :)
When my church decides to give money I have donated to reparations they have received the last friggin dime I will ever give them. They better find a new way to keep the doors open.
My government already gives reparations. Isnt that why we are rebuilding Chocolate City/ Why we have affirmative action jobs? Why we lower standards to hire blacks?
Hoping to beat out illegals in the giveaway sweepstakes.
Erin Texeira, "Black Reparations Idea Builds at UCLA Meeting," Los Angeles Times, 5/12/01
By Erin Texeira. Real life at work for women of color ...
Erin Texeira Writes about culture, race and ethnicity for Newsday and lives in Brooklyn, NY
Growing anger among blacks as Latinos 'take over'. April 7, 2006. BY ERIN TEXEIRA.
By Erin Texeira Associated Press (August 21, 2005) What do you call a minority that is becoming the majority?
by ERIN TEXEIRA , Associated Press March 28th, 2006 -- Even though the economy has picked up, stubborn gaps between blacks and whites remain _ a reality
But as soon as the master was gone
they did what they really wanted to do
Erin Texeira, Black men quietly combating stereotypes, Associated Press. ...
By Erin Texeira, AP BERKELEY, California (AP)--Well over a century after it was abolished, slavery lingers in the American psyche,
LBJs Great Society was your multi-billion dollar reparation. To the extent it was used for educating yourselves, investing in your own business startups, and teaching your children the value of self-reliance, then you spent it well. If you frittered it away, too bad. But it's not too late. Miami's Haitian community as strong and economically viable. Go learn.
The Democrats won't touch this issue with a 20' pole. They'll lose the last of their liberal white voters and they know it.
It is a dead issue that only serves for a good news story. Not to mention, every year around tax time many black people fall victim to reparation scams where they turn over their tax returns to con-men who promise them "reparation checks" of 100 times the value of their returns.
Oh, it gets even better.
How do you handle the decedents of slave owners that were themselves black?
Do they give reparations to themselves?
DIXIE'S CENSORED SUBJECT -- BLACK SLAVEOWNERS
"Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
To return to the census figures quoted above, this 28 percent is certainly impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters. "
J. Jackson has already requested the money. He will distribute to those who deserve it.
Nothing will divide the country more if whites have to give money to Tiger woods and 80 % of NFL players.
First & foremost, reparation must include repatriation. Any African who doesn't want to be repatriated is admitting that they're better off in the US than they would have been had they been left in Africa. If having their ancestors brought here in slavery has made them better off than they would have been otherwise, then what claim do they have to reparation? Of course any repatriation would have to be permanent. Those being repatriated would have to give up their US citizenship.
Second, reparation dollar amounts must be based on the African enonomy not the US economy. If we have damaged some Africans by removing them from Africa, then obviously the amount of reparation we owe them would have to based on what they could be expected to earn in Africa not the US. If there income expectancy is higher in the US, then where is the economic damage? I have developed the following formula and taken wild guesses at the variables.
A 30 year old African decides he wants his reparation and he would like to be repatriated to Kenya. Ok, we find out the life expectancy in Kenya is 50 years. We also find out the average annual income in Kenya is $2,000. So we subtract his age from 50 and find out he has 20 years to live in Kenya. We multiple 20 times $2,000 and his reparation amount is $40,000. Plus we would give him free transportation to Kenya.
Since we have given him Kenya's average annual income for the rest of his life, he should be able to move to Kenya and live the rest of his life without ever having to work again. What more could a reasonable man ask?
It seems totally reasonable to me to base all of this on African life expectancies and African income levels because had we not enslaved their ancestors, then that is what they would have been born into. That is what they would have to look forward to. With the above two rules, I totally support reparation for Africans in America.
Go to Liberia, a nation founded by freed slaves where every day they curse their ancestors for leaving America.
My people were in Ireland and were poorer that US slaves at the time. Who in the hell do I owe what to????
I believe that some of my ancestors were slaves during the Roman Empire. Can I sue Italy for reparations? </s>
LOL!
I'll gladly pay anyone that I ever owned.
By the way, how many people have gotten your tag line? I'll keep it to myself for now since I figure you went obscure for a reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.