If a social liberal Republican loses it will be because of the so called moral conservatives, like yourself, who would refuse to vote for them and let a Democrat win instead.
Your damn right i'd never vote for an adulterer.
That's right it would be because of them and 100million more like me.. I dont' want a RINO, I want an elephant.
How come most so called "moral conservatives" are fiscal conservtives too, but when we try to "rain on the prarade" of the RINOS "that only CLAIM to care about money", then they have to be the ones that insult those of us that care about so called "moral issues". I say that we pick someone who is both Morally and Fiscally conservative, that way we avoid the intra-party fight (at least as far as the right-is concerned), now the Rockefeller-liberals is another story, but we dont' want RINOS ANYWAY. WE WANT TRUE-RED-ELEPHANTS (not Demo's desguised as Repubs.)!
"If a social liberal Republican loses it will be because of the so called moral conservatives, like yourself, who would refuse to vote for them and let a Democrat win instead."
Wrong! If our party decides to sell-out the moral principles that it has claimed to hold since Ronald Reagan was our great president, then it will reap what it deserves. If those who were willing to go along and sell-out themselves wish to whine and blame those of us who ARE (not "so-called") moral conservatives, so be it. I will not worry about answering to such whiners. It is God that I have to answer to, nobody else. He will not be asking me on Judgment Day why I chose to turn my back on the innocent unborn and vote for a pro-abort (not to mention pro-gay, anti-gun) man for president. At the grassroots level, we need to demand more from this great party of Reagan. Otherwise, we will slide into the Zell Miller version of the Republican Party. You know, "I didn't leave the Republican Party, it left me."