Posted on 07/06/2006 1:25:43 PM PDT by proudofthesouth
I understand, but politely disagree. Your rationale is that kids should learn the hard way? Because they don't know better, they sometimes do dangerous things. But, it is the parent/gardian that should "require" the use of safety equipment. Not, the nanny state.
Doesn't OnStar do that? How else would they know where to send the police when your airbag deploys?
This article is from May 2005....what were the results from Oregon's "tests"?
Everywhere.
Insanity.
At the border of the state, a radio-tracking collar will be affixed to your neck.
And your ear will be tagged.
So that they can track your migratory routes and mating patterns.
"States are losing money because of more efficient cars...well you can't have it both ways."
Sure you can. If they need more money to maintain the roads, all they have to do is to increase the gas tax. This is simply a control all aspects of the populace, mandatory tracking in every vehicle power grab. It has nothing to do with simply raising revenue for the roads.
"States are losing money because of more efficient cars...well you can't have it both ways."
Sure you can. If they need more money to maintain the roads, all they have to do is to increase the gas tax. This is simply a control all aspects of the populace, mandatory tracking in every vehicle power grab. It has nothing to do with simply raising revenue for the roads.
Luck had very little to do with it.......
They aren't mandated.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.