[Lancey Howard]

Ann apparently has a problem with the Post, but I don't. Every paper - - including the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal - - has its share of humorless scumbag liberals on board. The Post is generally pretty conservative, at least editorially. I figure there's a few humorless scumbags at the Post that Ann let get under her skin. Fortunately for her, (I am pretty sure) there are a whole lot more people who read her columns than read the Post, so she will always have the upper hand in any battles with them.

[steve8714]

Ann Coulter gives the Left some of what has been its stock in trade for 40 years. In-your-face, demonizing name calling. In their case it is quite accurate, and they don't like it. This is why they attempt to physically intimidate her- which doesn't work. O'Reilly thinks civility works best, but I disagree. The problem with "conservatives" in this country is they too often go along for the sake of getting along, turning into Lindsay Graham.

[OESY]

The Post pimps conservative positions. Apart from the more obvious blunders (above), not only did it endorse both Hillary and Chuckie for the Senate and appears to be pushing Elliot Spitzer for governor, but it beats up regularly on Republicans. In a room full of Post reporters I have found it hard to find a denser brand of liberalism--albiet, with tangential neo-con tendencies. In fact, by its crass coverage, Luckovich cartoons, gossip columns, tasteless headlines and misplaced priorities, the Post has become an embarrassment to all who deign to buy it. After all, this is the newspaper that called Laura Ingraham an airhead. But there is hope: The best part of the Post is the Letters to the Editor section.