Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: timberlandko
3) mp3 sucks anyway, due to its inherent lossy compression; listening to most "ripped" music is almost akin to listening to it over the telephone. Even at the highest copy resolutions commonly available, the reduced frequency response, separation, and harmonics, along with other artifacts of digitizing, are objectionable to the discerning listener using decent equipment. Music copied from Broadcast FM, well recorded from a clean signal, blows away the sound quality of any consumer music digitizing scheme.

If the quality is so bad, why is the RIAA suing their customers over it?

101 posted on 07/04/2006 10:10:11 AM PDT by killjoy (Dirka dirka mohammed jihad! Sherpa sherpa bakalah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: killjoy
If the quality is so bad, why is the RIAA suing their customers over it?

Quality has nothing to do with it; the crime is making the copyrighted intellectual property freely available for unlicensed distribution - that very simple point seems impossible for some folks to get a grip on. It isn't the music, it isn't the copying, it isn't the listening, its the illegal distribution.

131 posted on 07/04/2006 11:24:35 AM PDT by timberlandko (Murphy was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson