I didn't defend anyone. I just asked you a question. You posted that you want to banish white Christians from the party and consign them to the darkness of the Left. I saught clarification. Your response was to call me a Nazi.
Seems to me you damn yourself by those you defend.
I defended no one. I merely pointed out your silliness.
I see you as the same as the New York Times.
You seem to know me well, for someone who knows nothing about me.
If you defend and support the radical islamics then you must be one or a fellow traveler.
So, all defense attorneys are guilty of the crimes of those they defend?
Your no attorney, and yes you are defending those ignorant people because you damn well know the ignorant racists that would drive everyone out of the Republican party except white christians are the ones I was talking about from my first post. I was quite clear in each and every post and you in your zest to defend such human filth are their willing collaborator.
He didn't say that. He said the white Christians that want to be alone in the party, that think all other non-Christian conservatives should get out or aren't "really" conservatives, can go pi$$ up a rope.
The white Christians that accept that people of many different religious beliefs can also be conservatives are totally fine. I believe that's the point Sentis was making.
And I've been told I wasn't a real conservative because I'm not Christian. I'm an extremely conservative pro-life Buddhist. Because of that, I was branded an "opportunist" who glommed onto the great things conservatism was about, but not a "true" conservative. I don't see how I would think conservatism was so great if I wasn't one, but apparently I do.