You can play 'I know you are but what am I?' all day long if you want. It will not help your case.
Before going further, we must clarify what exactly you mean by 'evidence'? Your definition of 'nothing' is a separate issue, but we'll avoid that complication for now.
Do you mean concrete evidence? That would be irrelevant since all concrete evidence is the same and can be interpreted both ways. Nothing to discuss there.
Do you mean interpretations of evidence? If so, perhaps you should try refuting my arguments wrt ERV's because I certainly brought those to the table just a few hours ago. If this is not what you mean by 'evidence', then you must not have been paying attention (since I am responding to multiple evos here, it would be a good idea for you to actually read the other responses before making claims).
Present your counter-arguments and we'll see whether your 'evidence' is anything more than metaphysical wanderings about unobserved past events. Careful though. You're likely to prove my point for me.
Or do you have some other definition of 'evidence' in mind that I have not covered above?
In which post?