Did you fail logic 101? The lack of evidence is not the proof for some other line of reasoning. First, a whole lot of trees died to make the tonnes of paper used to print the scholarly articles on this very subject. So there is ample evidence. Secondly, even though you do not believe this evidence, does not make manifewst evidence supporting a spontaneous, anonymous creation. You have no evidence for this 'creation' aside from a generic 'look around you' comment. Ever consider actuallty spending some time with real archeologists? They tend to be very pleasant people who love to share their interest in very old, dead things. Or are you too easily distracted with somehting like ADHD to be able to concentrate on the great detail in these subjects.
We do not see legs 'evolving' today. Why should that process have stopped? No reason.
You do not understand that imposing a 'leg evolution' sequence on a jumbled mess of geology is not science.