I didn't say you wrote that, I was posting to sentis. Sorry for your misunderstanding that it was directed at you. I think sentis may have issues with Christians, in general.
I'm happy to debate or discuss, but it's difficult to have an intelligent conversation when ad hominem attacks or witty rejoinders like "BS" are the preferred means of discourse.
Here's just some of what sentis wrote:
To: Central Scrutiniser
I am always wishing those same people would go on over to hang with their intellectual equals in the democrat party.
50 posted on 07/03/2006 10:56:30 AM PDT by Sentis
To: Skooz
Nope just the intellectual giants in the Christian camp that confuse conservatism with their religion. We dont need them and they generally turn out to be knuckle dragging racists too and so fit much better with the libs.
54 posted on 07/03/2006 11:01:13 AM PDT by Sentis
Trust me you would fit right in. I suggest anyone that thinks that atheists, hindus, buddists, blacks, hispanics or others aren't fit to be conservatives stop posting here and go where your wanted.
61 posted on 07/03/2006 11:08:01 AM PDT by Sentis
I said in a previous post that Christians are not exclusionary, nor racist. And there are many that contribute thoughtful postings to Free Republic. And I do not "confuse" my Christianity with conservativism - morals and ethics, including Christianity, are an integral part of conservative thought.
Blessings,
(Sentis, sorry I'm speaking for you again, but I'm apparently the only one who can understand Sentisese.)
Sentis is aware that there are Christians on the right who are tolerant of other Non-Christian conservatives. He has no problem with those people.
The particular Christians Sentis was complaining about are the ones who ARE NOT tolerant of other non-Christian conservatives. They are not a large group, thankfully, but they DO exist, even on this forum. I've been confronted by them before.