Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2006 2:02:06 PM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ncountylee
Once again my Senator, Feinstein, embarrassed the state by making zero sense.
2 posted on 07/02/2006 2:02:43 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
"We're gonna have hearings, we're going to examine the court decision very carefully," McCain said in an exclusive appearance on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos." "I am confident that we can make sure that bad guys … are not released … and those that deserve to be released will be."

Snort.

I thought that's what we've been doing all long, McKeating...er, McCain.

3 posted on 07/02/2006 2:04:08 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

If the executive branch is coequal to the other two, why can't it just tell the Supreme Court to go ahead and try to enforce its ruling. Isn't that what past presidents did when the courts encroached?


4 posted on 07/02/2006 2:10:21 PM PDT by DC Bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

What? Mr. McPain is not going to propose an amendment to Senate bill calling for immediate stop of abuse?


5 posted on 07/02/2006 2:11:10 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
Leave it to the liberals at the AP to spew about fellow liberals' vaunted "humanitarian concern" for the terrorist animals.

The usual degenerate Leftist swill.

7 posted on 07/02/2006 2:15:07 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

A RINO and a LIB debating. For cryin' out loud, there can't be a debate with both sides agreein' w/each other.


10 posted on 07/02/2006 2:21:18 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
The Geneva Conventions were considered necessary because in their absence, it was assumed that warring parties would be cruel to their captives. It was also assumed that if one side took refuge in civilian populations, the other side would pursue them there, and kill lots of civilians in the process.

Sadly, because we have been neutered since Vietnam, we treat all prisoners humanely and when terrorists hide in civilian centers, without wearing insignia or gathering separately from civilians, we don't attack them anyway. There remains, therefore, no use to the Geneva Convention. It doesn't apply to our enemies, and we follow it no matter what. This is more true with the Supreme Court's Hamdan decision.

We will know we are serious about this war when we destroy whole villages bacause terrorists are sheltered within. We did it to Atlanta 150 years ago and all of Germany 60 years ago. If push comes to shove, maybe we can remember what it's like to have the will to win a war. I know our fighting men know how; the politicians are the ones who fight to lose.

12 posted on 07/02/2006 2:45:10 PM PDT by Defiant (MSM are holding us hostage. Vote Dems into power, or they will let the terrorists win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson