"well i was not advocating him"
Excuse me, but attributing characteristics like, "smart" (LOL) and "charasmatic" are YOUR subjective labels. They were totally unnecessary if all you were reporting was " wanted to show how he is going to run and what he was thinking"
Those subjective descriptions have Nothing to do with "know(ing) what your opposition is up to or how they plan on staking their claim"
point well taken
he is smart and he is charasmatic
my point would be there were others that were not good people (or good presidents, think Billy boy) that were smart and charasmatic and successfully came from no where and won,
so as republicans be on your toes
be aware
and be prepared to be able to combat wit and charisma it is a potent component of any candidate, an abundance of it has won races for non-qualified candidates , a lack of it has lost races for stellar candidates...
get it??????????????????????
No, smart and charismatic are both words with definate meanings. Look them up in the dictionary. If you want to prove the author is being subjective this is not the way to do it. Furthermore, any politician who has been as successful as Biden would probably be both smart and charismatic. What's wrong with your perspective that you don't realize that?