[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

What she chose to do was infinitely better than abortion.

It seems to me that the parents (or at least the mother) should have some say in the types of people who qualify for adopting the child. The adoption agency should be seen to be an agency of the birth parent(s) as much as for the adoptive parents. (So long as the child is protected.)

Even real estate agents are required to act in the interests of both parties to the transaction. Adoptions are far more important.

[highlander_UW]

I agree, carrying to term and then adopting out was the best option for her. Suggesting that it doesn't matter if the adopting "parents" are homosexuals means she does not care what happens to the child. A quick review of statistics show that homosexuals abuse children at a MUCH greater rate than heterosexuals. Additionally, practicing homosexuals have a very much shorter lifespan than heterosexuals. There are also higher instances of disease amongst homosexuals...all of these, of course, are not much addressed in the MSM so ignorant people such as this woman have no clue what they are claiming.

[DBeers]

It seems to me that the parents (or at least the mother) should have some say in the types of people who qualify for adopting the child.

Generally speaking, at one time [they] did and in some cases still do. Children without custodial parents are wards of the state -as such "society" is the custodial parent. What we see here is an activist court or judge (servant od society) imposing his or her beliefs over that of the custodial parent (society)...