Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

This "ruling" has to be the most idiotic explanation of a ruling ever from the SC. There is 100+ pages of a ruling that could have been summed up on one, the President and Congress must create law before putting the terrorist at GITMO before a military tribunal, nothing more nothing less but the libs are running with this as though the war is over.


723 posted on 06/29/2006 9:54:22 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob; Howlin; xsmommy; hobbes1; tobyhill
It is interesting that - no matter WHAT the topic, or who are the two parties in the case are, or what the "beginning" of the case was, or what the law in question actually says, are - the 4 (+1) liberal/internationalists/socialists on the court will vote uniformly and ALWAYS AGAINST the traditional or "American" Christian conservative, republican form of government that the framers demanded.

The 4 socialist anti-American liberal members of the Court now plainly see themselves as the last "Ruling Bastion" of their way in the government, and they are dead-set determined in keeping that control until they are dragged from the Court in a coffin.
737 posted on 06/29/2006 10:05:42 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson