Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamiefoxer
If found guilty of participating in a legitimate war against us, they should be accorded POW status and held an appropriate, HUMANE facility on our territory, that is overseen by our Congress and Supreme Court UNTIL the end of our conflicts with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Why is this hard to do?

Because, er, the AQ terrorists:

Have NOT "declared war" against us, they are merely MURDERING us and our troops, and our civilians over there, and THEIR OWN civilians and troops and police and judges and doctors and ....

Are NOT part of any army.

Do NOT wear uniforms.

Have NOT signed the Geneva Convention.

BREAK EVERY Geneva Convention requirement for treatment of prisoners, innocents, civilians, and soldiers.

Are NOT a "nation" or "state".

Murder their prisoners (Did I mention that one already?) rather than feed or treat them.

Have NO "chain of command" or "visible" authority willing to "sign" as their head or commander. (Who are you going to "negotiate" with or get to "sign" a prisoner of war treaty?)

611 posted on 06/29/2006 9:20:13 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
[ACLU Calls Supreme Court's Hamdan Decision a Victory for the “Rule of Law”]

Title of another thread on FR.
638 posted on 06/29/2006 9:27:15 AM PDT by khnyny (Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

You failed to read my procedures. If Al-Qaeda, follow procedure #1. If pow, follow #2.

Procedures to follow, in a nutshell.

#1 If Al-Qaeda, try, prove, find guilty or innocent, and either IMPRISON (if guilty) or release (if innocent).

#2 If legitimate POW, hold in appropriate facility humanely with oversight from Congress and SCOTUS, and release after end of our wars.

Simple LEGAL procedures we can follow that maintain our national security AND maintain our rule of law/values.


641 posted on 06/29/2006 9:28:16 AM PDT by jamiefoxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Because, er, the AQ terrorists: Have NOT "declared war" against us,

Well, technically THAT isn't true. 1996 was it?

OBL laid out a declaration of what and why. One of the main reasons is that we are too morally weak, wimpy, and generally decadent to defend ourselves for long, and with a proper nudge we'll give up and collapse - pretty much the Dem party platform.

726 posted on 06/29/2006 9:56:42 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Because, er, the AQ terrorists: Have NOT "declared war" against us,

Well, technically THAT isn't true. 1996 was it?

OBL laid out a declaration of what and why. One of the main reasons is that we are too morally weak, wimpy, and generally decadent to defend ourselves for long, and with a proper nudge we'll give up and collapse - pretty much the Dem party platform.

Just to be clear...you're dead on with the other criteria.

727 posted on 06/29/2006 9:57:42 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson