Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dotnetfellow
> He had to. It was his decision they were ruling on.

So? Why couldn't he rule on his own decision? He's the Chief Justice for petes sake.

Judicial ethics forbid it. It's a clear conflict of interest.

507 posted on 06/29/2006 8:48:13 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: IMRight

After reading my post, I wish I had not palced the quotations around "insight". It conveys derision that I did not intend.

Sorry, no offense meant!


512 posted on 06/29/2006 8:52:14 AM PDT by Praxeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson