Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ron in Acreage

Screw the DEMS...the American people got screwed here....what the hell do we do with people caught on the battlefield?


34 posted on 06/29/2006 7:17:15 AM PDT by Dog (The founders gave freedom of the press to the people, they didn't give freedom to the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Dog

Democrats want them to have citizenship and voting rights.


49 posted on 06/29/2006 7:19:10 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (VOTE DEMOCRAT--TERRORISTS ARE COUNTING ON IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

Give 'em a trial? How do other civilized Western countries do it? Do the British have Iraqi POWs or how did they deal with their own "terrorists"? How do the Spanish deal with the Basque ETA terrorists, etc.?

With all due respect to the esteemed members on this board, I'm not sure this decision is bad for democracy. We are America because this country stands for the rule of law, due process, and making sure that all, citizens or non-citizens alike, have certain standards of protection against government encroachment. If we have learned anything from Gitmo, it's that many of those at Gitmo were wrongly imprisoned and then released and sent home. Give trials to the inmates, figure out which are innocent, and then the ones who are guilty of crimes against the United States (non-state terrorists), imprison, and those who are guilty of just fighting against us in a legitimate war (POWs) treat according to the Geneva Conventions or similar standars applied by other civilized Western nations.

I think if we did that with the Gitmo detainees, I don't think the Left OR anyone in the world would complain about it. We would be fulfilling our commitment to our values or rule and law and due process, and we'd be sure the guys we imprison either deserve their imprisonment, or are detained as POW's until our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are over.

There are mechanisms already in place to deal with these detainees without breaking the law or assuming extra authority. Guys, I must side with SCOTUS on this issue...as a Legal Studies major, SCOTUS is right on this.


331 posted on 06/29/2006 8:01:05 AM PDT by jamiefoxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

"....what the hell do we do with people caught on the battlefield?"




Simple.....kill them!


450 posted on 06/29/2006 8:33:13 AM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

In the ruling, it seems like they're saying that military commissions are mostly for emergency trials on the battlefield itself, and that courts martial are more appropriate for situations five years later when the immediate emergency has passed.


872 posted on 06/30/2006 3:09:53 PM PDT by aspiringcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson