Posted on 06/28/2006 6:04:09 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
*sniff*.....whewee, we got a stinker on this thread.
Be gone fool. Rush plead NOT GUILTY to the trumpted up allegations and the DA had zip, zilch, nada to charge him on.
Come back when you are out of diapers.
Rush needs to be VERY careful. It isn't hard to plant drugs on somebody. And nothing would surprise me anymore from the left.
Limbaugh is a victim only of his own hubris.
No, you're wrong. When the press has something bad or embarrassing on a conservative they never let go - O'Reilly did the right thing showing the two women "defenders" up for what they were - women who made "legal" decisions based on personal negative "feelings" for Limbaugh. Their types are nightmares for everyone who loves the law.
Time for Billy Goat Gruff to take care of this troll.
Rush never assigned blame anywhere for his addiction to pain killers. He took responsibility (unlike Patches Kennedy, until forced) and initiated treatment.
Now, I think you are probably not long for this forum. Don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.
I suppose somebody in diapers does know quite a bit about smells...
Someone said they'd rather get Rush than anyone except Bush.
I think they'd almost rather get Rush than ANYONE even Karl Rove.
Rush should have had HIS PILLS in HIS PILL BOTTLE and not under a FAKE NAME. End of story. Rush screwed up
I believe in his heart O'Reilly wants Rush to go down. I recall when Rush went Deaf O'reilly wanted to get on talk radio in his time slot to replace him and capture his audience.
Somebody could bump into Rush and plant a packet of illegal stuff. Or put some in his car, plane etc.
If I were him, for the next 15 months or so, I'd avoid announcing my movements in advance. And I'd hire a bodyguard if he doesn't already have one. Or two.
And I'd be alert for any changes in routine regarding his car or plane maintenance. Again, because stuff could be planted.
I disagree. If a doctor gives a patient a prescription for medicine, and the patient doesn't want their name on the bottle, that's the patient's choice, and not the government's. In Rush's case it was for privacy. I once took OxyContin and didn't want my address on the bottle for security purposes. I didn't want, for whatever reason, a discarded bottle falling into the wrong hands, causing junk heads coming to my place looking for drugs to break in. Did I screw up too?
You did not screw up. But some of these gov't policies are totally screwed.
Wow, Hildy, you hit the nail on the head. O'Reilly had no business even coveing this non-story. He definitley had a ruthless motive for even mentioning it.
Like I said, when you have pills in someone elses name and you go thru CUSTOMS of all places....it doesnt take a rocket scientist to know that you're asking for trouble
Too late..... he was the height of arrogance. He sided with the NYtimes (they did nothing wrong), said that an INTERNATIONAL COURT should be in charge of the terrorists at Gitmo, and when asked what he would have done different, he went into a tyrade about what Bush did wrong, not about what he would do. If he were stripped of his retirement benefits, I would call that a good start.
I don't know what's worse, Viagra gate, or people all over the internet making a huge fuss over his milisecond kiss with Mary Lynn "Chloe" Rajskub.
And THAT, Pepperdog is exactly the truth! When you're traveling, you have so much stuff and so much space. I throw everything into one bottle, and the last time, I used a film cannister! I know what each pill is, and if anybody wants to charge me with something ridiculous they can just do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.